VestingPoint
Silicon Valley equity administration firm processing deceased employees' stock compensation
$2.4M
Average equity value at risk per deceased employee case
The Problem#
- When a tech employee dies, their equity compensation becomes extraordinarily complex to administer — unvested RSUs may accelerate on death, stock options have exercise windows that shorten, ESPP contributions need refunding, and phantom stock may have different death provisions
- Each equity type has different tax treatment: ISO vs NSO options, short-term vs long-term capital gains, AMT implications, and the step-up in basis at death
- The HR department sends the executor a 40-page equity summary PDF; the executor’s attorney has never seen one before
- The exercise window for stock options after death is typically 90 days — miss it and the options expire worthless
- The
us-estateextension’s community property rules may mean the surviving spouse owns half the equity automatically, depending on state
How They’d Use INHERIT#
- Employee stock compensation is modelled in
asset.jsonwithcategory: "financial"and subcategories for each type: ISO options, NSOs, RSUs, ESPPs, phantom stock, and SARs - Each equity grant includes grant date, vesting schedule, exercise price (for options), number of shares, cliff date, and accelerated vesting provisions on death
valuation.jsoncaptures the fair market value at date of death — critical for the step-up in basis calculation- The
us-estateextension handles state-level variation: California community property, Delaware corporate law, and federal estate tax thresholds common/tax-position.jsonmodels the deceased’s tax residency, AMT status, and treaty positionsevent.jsontracks the administration timeline — option exercise deadlines, RSU vesting dates, ESPP refund dates — withtrigger: "calendar_deadline"alerts
The Integration#
- Bidirectional: VestingPoint imports INHERIT documents from company HR systems, adds equity-specific valuations and tax calculations, and returns the enriched document to the executor’s attorney
- Automated deadline tracking ensures no option exercise windows are missed
- The structured format means the attorney receives typed, validated data instead of a 40-page PDF
The Business Case#
- Average equity value at risk per case: $2.4 million — option exercise windows, RSU acceleration, and tax elections are all time-sensitive
- VestingPoint charges $15,000 per estate for full equity administration — typically less than 1% of the equity value at stake
- 12 cases per year involve missed deadlines under the current PDF-based process — VestingPoint’s structured tracking eliminates this entirely
- Tax-optimised exercise strategies save an average of $180,000 per estate in unnecessary capital gains tax
Before / After#
Without INHERIT:
- A software engineer dies with $3.2 million in equity across RSUs, ISOs, and an ESPP
- HR sends a 40-page PDF summary to the executor; the executor’s attorney has never administered tech equity
- The attorney takes 6 weeks to understand the document; during that time, the 90-day option exercise window passes
- $400,000 in stock options expire worthless; the estate pays $85,000 more in tax than necessary due to missed elections
With INHERIT:
- HR exports the deceased’s equity compensation as structured
asset.jsonentries with vesting schedules, exercise prices, and acceleration terms - VestingPoint imports the INHERIT document and generates a deadline-driven action plan
- Stock options are exercised optimally within 30 days; RSU acceleration is confirmed with the company
- The estate saves $400,000 in preserved options and $85,000 in tax — total benefit: $485,000
“The deceased's equity compensation included 4,000 unvested RSUs on a four-year cliff, stock options with three different exercise prices, and an ESPP contribution still deducting from a final paycheck that hadn't been issued yet.”Jordan Reeves, COO, VestingPoint
Disclaimer: VestingPoint is a fictional organisation created for illustrative purposes. This case study describes a hypothetical integration scenario. All metrics, savings, and outcomes are projected estimates, not actual results. References to real regulatory bodies, courts, and legislation are for accuracy and do not imply endorsement.