WitnessChain
Digital attestation platform providing tamper-evident will execution records
99.7%
Attestation validity rate for digitally recorded executions
The Problem#
- Will execution requirements are strict: the testator must sign in the presence of witnesses, the witnesses must sign in each other’s presence, and the whole thing must be properly attested
- Attestation challenges are the leading cause of will invalidity in US probate courts — “I don’t remember signing that,” “I wasn’t in the room,” “the testator seemed confused”
- Remote Online Notarisation (RON) is now legal in 47 US states, but the recording and attestation data is stored in proprietary platforms with no interoperable format
- When a RON-attested will is challenged, the notary platform must produce the recording — but platform closures, acquisitions, and format changes put these records at risk
How They’d Use INHERIT#
- Will execution is modelled in
attestation.jsonwithmethod: "video"or"remote"andattestationType: "written_signed" - RON-specific fields:
ronSessionId,ronPlatform,ronRecordingContentUrl, andronRecordingRetentionYears testatorSignedInPresenceOfWitnessesandwitnessesSignedInPresenceOfTestatorare explicit booleans — the legal requirements are captured as structured data, not assumedidentityVerificationMethodrecords how the testator was verified:"government_id","credential_analysis","knowledge_based_authentication", or"biometric"tamperEvidenceMethodandtamperEvidenceValueprovide cryptographic proof that the recording hasn’t been alteredvideoDeclarationcaptures the testator’s spoken declaration of testamentary intent withdeclarationType,contentUrl,recordingDuration, andtranscriptwitnessConflictCheckandwitnessConflictCheckScoperecord that the witnesses were checked for conflicts of interest under the applicable state’s rules- The
us-estateextension handles state-level variation — self-proving affidavit requirements differ across states
The Integration#
- Export-focused: WitnessChain generates INHERIT attestation records during the will execution ceremony
- The attestation record is attached to the will’s INHERIT document as a structured proof of valid execution
- When the will enters probate, the court receives a machine-readable attestation record with tamper evidence, video reference, and identity verification — not just a paper affidavit
The Business Case#
- 99.7% attestation validity rate for digitally recorded executions, vs approximately 94% for traditional paper attestation
- Attestation challenges dismissed 3x faster when structured evidence is available — average 45 days vs 135 days
- WitnessChain charges $150 per attestation — approximately 50,000 attestations per year across partner law firms
- RON recording retention is guaranteed by the structured
ronRecordingRetentionYearsfield — the attestation survives platform changes
Before / After#
Without INHERIT:
- A testator executes a will via RON with two witnesses; the notary platform records the session
- Three years later, the testator dies; the will enters probate
- A disinherited heir challenges the will — “the witnesses weren’t really present” and “the testator seemed confused”
- The attorney contacts the RON platform; the platform was acquired and the recording is in a proprietary format that requires a specialist to extract
- The attestation challenge takes 8 months and costs $45,000 in legal fees
With INHERIT:
- WitnessChain records the execution ceremony and generates a structured
attestation.jsonwith video reference, tamper evidence, identity verification, and witness conflict checks - Three years later, the will enters probate with the attestation record attached
- The disinherited heir’s attorney reviews the structured evidence: video recording with transcript, identity verification via government ID, tamper-evidence hash
- The challenge is dismissed in 6 weeks; the video speaks for itself
“Both witnesses were alive, competent, and absolutely certain they had never signed the document. The video recording from their attestation three years earlier suggested otherwise.”Professor James Whitaker, Legal Adviser, WitnessChain
Disclaimer: WitnessChain is a fictional organisation created for illustrative purposes. This case study describes a hypothetical integration scenario. All metrics, savings, and outcomes are projected estimates, not actual results. References to real regulatory bodies, courts, and legislation are for accuracy and do not imply endorsement.